Blame the victims sounds a bit familiar doesn't it?

Story: Microsoft blames users for Vista infectionsTotal Replies: 7
Author Content
phsolide

May 21, 2008
10:34 AM EST
Didn't MSFT blame the users for the *insane* number of problems in IIS, Windows NT 4.0, and Internet Explorer's willingness to execute just about anything? And for allowing unsigned, untrusted ActiveX components to execute? And for any number of other non-transgressions caused by BROKEN BY DESIGN software?

This sounds all too familiar.

How long before they change their tune? Days, weeks, months or years?
techiem2

May 21, 2008
10:51 AM EST
Yeah, you gotta love that.
"Our software is secure! It's all the users' fault! They're too stupid to use it right!"
Scott_Ruecker

May 21, 2008
11:23 AM EST
Windows is safe, as long as you don't connect it to a network..

;-)
rijelkentaurus

May 21, 2008
11:34 AM EST
The safest AV for Windows:

[HYPERLINK@goodbye-microsoft.com]
jdixon

May 21, 2008
11:35 AM EST
> Windows is safe, as long as you don't connect it to a network..

And don't insert any removable media.
techiem2

May 21, 2008
11:42 AM EST
>And don't insert any removable media.

And don't boot it.
Bob_Robertson

May 21, 2008
1:42 PM EST
I thought Windows machines came with warning signs next to the power switches:

"Warning: Activating this switch can cause system instability"
rijelkentaurus

May 21, 2008
2:25 PM EST
Quoted:

And don't insert any removable media.


Except Knoppix, of course.

Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]

Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!